​

• Statement of intended teaching context — will this be a classroom teaching demo or an exercise in public philosophy? Who is your audience? (<50 words)
   

• Description of topic and how, specifically, you intend to present it (e.g., powerpoint, discussion, activity, etc.)  (<300 words)
   

• Specific features of the presentation you hope to receive feedback on (<200 words)
   

• Brief summary of teaching experience (both overall and with the proposed topic, if any) (<150 words)

​

• Description of topic and proposed new approach/way of framing
   

• Explanation of philosophical &/or pedagogical motivations for, & benefits of, proposed approach/way of framing (<400 words)
   

• Explanation of how the proposed approach/framing differs from typical ones for that topic (<300 words)
   

• (if relevant) Summary of your experiences teaching with the proposed approach/new way of framing  (<250 words)
   

• List of potential courses/areas where this approach to the topic could be implemented

​

• Pitch for proposed roundtable/panel discussion (<450 words)
   

• Description of proposed format (how many speakers, whether they will mini presentations prior to open discussion, what those presentations would be about)
   

• Name, email, relation to academic philosophy (e.g., student, instructor, former student/instructor, non-philosophy academic), and twitter handle (if relevant) of presenter(s)
   

• List of prospective questions/topics to discuss

​

• Extended abstract outlining proposed framing of teaching philosophy "as a way of _____" (should include some combination of explicit discussion of what philosophy is, the value of it, what constitutes expertise in philosophy, and who philosophy is for (500-750 words)
   

• Specific, concrete examples of ways to implement proposed framing in the classroom (e.g., assignments, topics, assessments, grading, activities, readings, syllabi) (300-500 words)

​

• Proposed course title/topic
   

• Outline of proposed course structure (list of topics, readings, and/or assignments — whatever is relevant to narrative)
   

• Explanation of overarching course-narrative and the philosophical &/or pedagogical motivations behind it (<400 words)
   

• Brief description of philosophical &/or pedagogical costs/limitations
  (if any) of proposed course-narrative (<100 words)

​

• Description of an alternative approach to grading/assessment (generally) or to a particular (kind of) activity or assignment
   

• Pitch for this alternative approach, including explanation of the theoretical basis of, motivations for, and your experiences with, using the proposed approach, activity, or assignment (<600 words)
   

• List of benefits and trade-offs, with special attention to workload, inclusivity, accessibility, & potential institutional considerations
  (<250 words)

​

• Description of philosophy teaching "life pro-tip" (LPT) (<50words)
   

• Explanation of the LPT's pedagogical motivations/payoffs (as well as possible difficulties/costs) (<100words)
   

• Concrete example of LPT application/use, ideally from your own teaching experience (<100words)
   

• Concrete suggestions for implementing the tool; examples (if any) of pitfalls to avoid while using it (<50words)